PERSONAL PERSPECTIVE

Back to index | Download this personal perspective in Acrobat PDF format. (PDF, 150KB)

REGIONAL STABILITY AND FISH
By Meryl Williams*

Australia is surrounded by the Indian, Pacific and Southern oceans and located among countries of great cultural and biological diversity. A constant but subtle theme in human development in the region is the use and dependence on fish and other aquatic life - for sustenance, for trade, for livelihood and for the environment.

In modern times, fish in the region has been a source of stability and instability - and over time the same resource may cause either. For example, in the last 20 years in Asia, the huge growth of shrimp farming and other aquaculture has helped fuel the economic growth of Thailand, Bangladesh and Vietnam. In these countries, fish exports dominate those of all other agricultural commodities, e.g., in Vietnam in 2001, USD1.8 billion of seafood was exported versus USD600 million of rice, and of most manufactures. At times, the prosperity brought by such growth has been destabilized by sudden trade restrictions such as blanket bans on shrimp exports to the European Union from Bangladesh over product quality, the US ban on the use of the name 'catfish' for the native Vietnamese catfish, and the US imposition of tariffs for shrimp from some countries. The growth of shrimp farming has also generated sporadic environmental and social protests.

Other examples of the stabilizing forces of fish and fisheries are the strong Pacific regional harmonization of tuna fisheries arrangements through the work of the Secretariat for the Pacific Community and the Forum Fisheries Agency - Australia is a strong member of both arrangements - and scientific collaborations with neighbouring countries over fisheries and environmental assessments.

In war times, fishing can offer a welfare safety net. This is witnessed during the recent years of civil conflict in Solomon Islands when paying jobs dried up and agriculture was not feasible for displaced people. In other difficult times, the safety net of subsistence fishing may prevent instability, as millions of the poor of Cambodia and Laos know in the annual cycle of the mighty Mekong River.

Fish can also lead to destabilizing forces such as when illegal fishing strains relations between countries.

I believe the answer is yes. We are at such a stage of understanding and capacity in the above types of fish issues to develop national approaches that address the complex challenges of fish in all regional agendas, including aid, the environment, fisheries, aquaculture and trade.

Already, many different parts of overseas aid and bilateral arrangements address fish issues. We have an opportunity to make the total more than the sum of the parts. The fish related activities have grown organically from many different seeds. They would now benefit from a new coherence and a comprehensive examination of opportunities and risks. For example, fish pop up in the aid program as means of livelihood to help landmine victims in Cambodia, as small business enterprises for women in Indonesia, as 'scientific bridges' among Australia and neighbouring countries and as part of the conservation message delivered to coastal communities by our Young Ambassadors for Development.

A thematic strategy, such as done last year for water (Making Every Drop Count: water and Australian aid) can add value to the activities by describing the multi-faceted challenges, canvassing the options and resources available for their solution, including people and expertise, and creating focus on the most promising strategies.

Australia has much to offer. It has become a world leader in fisheries and conservation through such mechanisms as its Oceans Policy and the tough moves to protect the Great Barrier Reef. Australia is also a world leader in applying international agricultural research to mutual advantage in the development program through ACIAR.

Australia's agricultural and fisheries scientists, managers and aid experts possess an outstanding capacity to help ensure that fish contribute more to stability in the region. The capacity that could be brought together resides in Australia's aid agencies (AusAID and ACIAR), in the private sector, non-government and civil society agencies and universities.

Now seems to be just the time to apply Australia's capacity in fish more fully to the regional agenda for stability.

*Dr Meryl Williams:7 June, 2005ategic policy support to the collective actions of the 15 Future Harvest Centers of the CGIAR. From 1994-2004 she was the Director General of the WorldFish Center, one of the Future Harvest Centers and the only global research center focused on fisheries and aquaculture research to eradicate poverty, aid food security and conserve the environment in developing countries. Dr Williams is also Chair of the FAO Advisory Committee on Fisheries Research and sits on the international scientific committees of several other global research programs.

The ATSE Crawford Fund
1 Leonard Street
Parkville 3052
Victoria Australia
T: (03) 9347 8328
F: (03) 9347 3224
E: crawford@mira.net
W: www.crawfordfund.org